![]() ![]() If you decide to play a long tiring and grinding defensive game on a day when you do not feel physically strong, you are most likely going to go down fighting in the last hour of the battle. For example it depends on your tournament rank, your mental and physical condition, etc. It is important that your playing style reflects your situation. ![]() Chess, just like life, demands a person to be adaptable to the conditions. Let me begin by explaining the yes part of the answer first. Unfortunately, the answer to this question is not very straight-forward, it is be part yes and part no. Thanks for bringing this hypothetical question, it is surprising to me that this question is a hypothetical one! With all the questions that are pouring in, I would tend to believe that something like this would have showed up a long time ago. I've heard some people say that you should "simplify when ahead." What does that mean? Am I supposed to play very differently when I'm ahead or behind? Thanks! principle when contemplating any design changes, as some of the most intricate systems can be made simpler first, before having to completely overhaul the design.ĭesigning simplicities in complex systems will be challenging, but I bet if you think about it, you can find simple solutions within the complexities.Hi, I've been playing chess online for 5 months and my rating is almost 1000. These restaurants took the aforementioned complex problem, and designed a simple, somewhat low-cost solution.Īs the restaurant industry’s complexities continue to evolve, always remember the K.I.S.S. The simplest examples take the form of a dedicated pickup shelf, followed by signage. So how did the titans of the take-away restaurant industry solve the complex issue of off and on-premises customers clashing, while also reducing the interaction with team members? Simple solutions, naturally. In a nutshell, this principle claims a system will work best if it is kept simple, rather than made complicated, or to eliminate any unnecessary complexity or be avoided altogether. Not to be confused with the legendary rock band, K.I.S.S. Some of the restaurants with the most success in serving off-premises customers, though, started with the understanding that simplicity is key.Īs an Industrial Engineer, I think back on a concept I was taught as a student, the K.I.S.S. To solve these challenges, some concepts invested heavily in automation in the form of kiosks or some other type of technology. This caused customer frustrations and front-of-house congestion issues. That was due to the fact the restaurant still required some interaction with the customer to complete the transaction. Upon arrival, off-premises customers continued to face the difficulty of having to queue in the same space as the on-premises customers. Though off-premises volume does offer operators certain simplicities, such as reducing/eliminating work content in table service and transactional labor, it did amplify the need to solve for ways to improve one of the few remaining interactions: handing off the food to customers who placed their orders off-premises. As take-away and delivery sales continue to grow in the United States, concepts continue to struggle in their search for simple ways to better facilitate off-premises sales growth, while reducing the work requirements of team members. ![]() One of the most prevalent problems today is the need to keep labor costs down, while maintaining a certain level of customer service. delivery, adding alcohol, etc.), these forms of rapid restaurant evolution sometimes drive the need to develop ground-breaking solutions to complex problems that may arise. From companies trying robotics and other forms of automation, to well-established chains trying to branch out into new areas (e.g. The Foodservice industry continues to evolve at a rapid pace, as it has been for the last 5 to 10 years. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |